Cast me not off in the time of old age; forsake me not when my strength faileth.
Psalms 71:9
I recently discovered a way to categorize people so that I know what to expect from them. It's seemingly simple, but it does get a bit confusing. It's based upon 2 mother strata which are: Selfishness and Selflessness. I believe that Everyone falls into one of those categories.
Selfishness is not necessarily a bad thing, and selflessness is not necessarily a good thing either. For a selfish person it is really hard to realize that they are selfish but relatively easy for others to see. Most of their actions and behaviors are for the greater good of themselves but it can involved good for others. For example: A doctor becomes a doctor because he thinks he appreciates human life and wants to do everything in his reach to prevent death. Although at first it seems like sheer selflessness, he actually became a doctor because he loves the feeling of saving a life. This is considered a selfish act, but as you can see, it was a GOOD selfish act. (ofcourse it could have also been a selfless act, but it was just an example)
Selflessness on the other hand is when people do acts and behave for the greater good of others. They prioritize the bonds of their friends, family, and even strangers over their own life. The severity of this can range from being selfless to only 1 person, up to being absolutely selfless and caring for literally everyone. A good example of this would be a stereotypical housewife. She cares for her husband, children, and house so much that they become her life. Selflessly, she accepts her fate and lives a boring life.
Everyone has both of these characteristics, but one of them has to dominate. Perfect balance between the two is literally impossible. It's like if ice and steam were able to live together forever.
That was just the beginning. This next part I'm especially proud of. It took me 19 years and countless of sleepless nights to stumble upon this next hypothesis. Under the selfish - selfless stratification lies a deeper, more defined strata which I labeled "Analyze - Control". Each person falls under one of these categories and like I previously mention about the "selfish - selfless" theory, analyzers and controllers have both a good side and a bad side.
The Analyst is the person who observes or pays any sort of attention to a certain noun. It can range from analyzing a plant, to analyzing the world (sociologists). This person gathers data and information about their particular interest and stores it for future references. To know how this person can use this data we have to know whether they are selfish or selfless. A selfish analyst analyzes information for the greater good of themselves. In other words, they may look at the way Billy was rejected by Sally and they will decide to avoid asking her out to avoid rejection. A selfless analyst would use the same information, but instead of keeping it to themselves, they would tell their friend Freddy who was planning on asking her out what she did to Billy. Both have their advantages, and both have disadvantages.
The Controller is the person who manipulates people in order to get what they desire. I know "manipulate" sounds like such a bad word, but I'm using it as the dictionary definition "to manage or utilize skillfully". This person lives the world as if it were a game. They can range from controlling 1 person, to controlling an entire army. Controllers are the people that become great leaders. An example of a Selfish Controller would be Adolf Hitler. He managed to manipulate an entire race of people and eliminated another because of a silly grudge on Jews. A Selfless Controller would be Martin Luther King Jr. A great leader who helped the nation open their eyes to the unequal rights of people from African decent. Being a controller doesn't mean you're evil, it means that it's your method of motivation.
Everybody has both of the "Analyst - Controller" characteristics, but unlike the "Selfish - Selfless" strata, their can be a balance. Never a perfect balance. It's just the fact that balance CAN exist, but it cannot be sustained.
In total, there is 4 different type of people in the world. Selfish Analyzers, Selfish Controllers, Selfless Analyzers, and Selfless Controllers. If you can figure out what a person is, you can pretty much predict their motives and intentions.
Yeah, it's a random hyperlink. It has really cool information though. If you have no life and want to read more I highly recommend it. lol Thanks for reading.
SPEER'S WORD OF THE DAY: Philanthropist
SPEER'S WORD OF THE DAY: Philanthropist

I dissent. All actions in this world on the part of homo sapiens are based on self-interest. Why does a man want to be a doctor? Why does a man rob a bank? Why does a man kill thirteen individuals? The motive, unfortunately, is always rooted in selfishness. All three, regardless of the deed receive self-gratification. The doctor saves a life, the man is able to pay for his child's surgery, and the man lives in infamy. I am not saying that this is a bad thing for doctors provide a vital service and the bank robber's intentions were pure. The murderer obviously doesn't belong in this category of moral selfishness. Humans are merely incapable of acting in any manner that doesn't benefit them in some way no matter how convoluted the connection. In short, a selfless act on the part of a human is nearly impossible.
ReplyDeleteOk...lol...honestly bro...you lost me at "hello"...but nice to hear from you again!!!
ReplyDelete@Anonymous: My philosophy originally started st the same conclusion as yours "Humans are merely incapable of acting in any manner that doesn't benefit them in some way", but as my observations expanded my theory was weakened. Eventually I realized that the only reason it was hard for me to accept the fact that selfless people exist was due to the fact that I am myself a selfish person. It's difficult to understand and ridiculous to believe, but that's because both you and I are selfish. I don't expect you to belive me. Yet. Keep observing these people. They can't be COMPLETELY selfless like I had stated, but they are driven to act for deeds of selflessness.
ReplyDelete@Arny: Thanks brother! It feels good to be back.
I really liked this a lot, I remember you telling about this theory, but I don't think I've ever read this blog. I also like the link to proxemics, it was very interesting, I'd like to read more about it. I miss reading your blogs! Just sayin... :)
ReplyDeletelmfao at the video!!
ReplyDelete